Regulatory context and infrastructure control

Cloud adoption does not transfer regulatory responsibility. Organisations remain accountable for their data, systems, and controls — regardless of where infrastructure is hosted.

The changing regulatory landscape

Cloud platforms are increasingly recognised as critical infrastructure. This has prompted greater regulatory attention across multiple jurisdictions.

In the UK, Ofcom’s expanding remit reflects this shift, including powers to assess and inspect cloud-hosted services where they affect resilience, competition, or data access.

This trend is not unique to the UK. It aligns with broader international scrutiny of outsourced digital infrastructure.

What this means for organisations

Regulatory oversight does not require organisations to abandon the cloud. It does, however, require clarity.

Boards and senior management are increasingly expected to demonstrate:

  • Where critical data is stored
  • Who can access it, and under what conditions
  • How services can be exited or replaced
  • How resilience and continuity are maintained

These questions cannot be answered solely by reference to a provider’s marketing materials.

Cloud does not remove accountability

While cloud providers operate and secure their platforms, regulatory responsibility remains with the organisation using them.

This includes:

  • Data protection and residency
  • Access control and auditability
  • Operational resilience
  • Exit planning and continuity

In practice, this means organisations must understand — not abstract away — the systems they rely on.

How self-hosting supports regulatory clarity

Properly designed self-hosted infrastructure can simplify regulatory conversations.

It offers:

  • Clear physical and jurisdictional boundaries
  • Direct visibility into system behaviour
  • Explicit access controls
  • Documented exit paths

This does not eliminate risk — but it makes risk understandable and defensible.

RefugeX’s role

RefugeX does not provide legal or regulatory advice.

Our role is to design and execute infrastructure transitions that:

  • Reduce unnecessary dependency risk
  • Improve operational transparency
  • Support regulatory accountability
  • Leave organisations with systems they can explain and control

We work alongside legal, compliance, and risk teams — not in place of them.

Clarity before commitment

If regulatory exposure or accountability is part of your infrastructure conversation, a neutral assessment can bring clarity without pressure.

Start a conversation